The rule of law is dead in the District of Columbia.
Of course, this is nothing new, given that the federal government calls that not-quite-state home, but this time around I am referring to the laws specifically governing that postage stamp of a municipality.
No person in the District shall possess, sell, or transfer any large capacity ammunition feeding device regardless of whether the device is attached to a firearm. For the purposes of this subsection, the term “large capacity ammunition feeding device” means a magazine, belt, drum, feed strip, or similar device that has a capacity of, or that can be readily restored or converted to accept, more than 10 rounds of ammunition. The term “large capacity ammunition feeding device” shall not include an attached tubular device designed to accept, and capable of operating only with, .22 caliber rimfire ammunition.
Having carefully reviewed all of the facts and circumstances of this matter, as it does in every case involving firearms-related offenses or any other potential violation of D.C. law within our criminal jurisdiction, OAG has determined to exercise its prosecutorial discretion to decline to bring criminal charges against Mr. Gregory, who has no criminal record, or any other NBC employee based on the events associated with the December 23,2012 broadcast. OAG has made this determination, despite the clarity of the violation of this important law, because under all of the circumstances here a prosecution would not promote public safety in the District of Columbia nor serve the best interests of the people of the District to whom this office owes its trust.
Despite the evidence Mr. Brinkley had been legally transporting the gun, his attorney Richard Gardiner said the D.C. Office of the Attorney General “wouldn’t drop it.” This is the same office now showing apparent reluctance to charge Mr. Gregory.
As someone with a bit more legal experience than me noted, "laws for thee but not me" are the very definition of "tyranny".
However, to go a slightly different direction than wfgodbold, the DC Attorney General claims they will not prosecute David Gregory for flagrantly breaking DC’s laws because…
…the intent of the temporary possession and short display of the magazine was to promote the First Amendment purpose of informing an ongoing public debate about firearms policy in the United States, especially while this subject was foremost in the minds of the public following the previously mentioned events in Connecticut and the President’s speech to the nation about them.
Shiny. Then with that context well and truly established for the District of Columbia, I dare say it is time for a "Normal Capacity Magazine Demonstration" in the nation’s capital – after all, demonstrations are the very definition of "the First Amendment purpose of informing an ongoing public debate", and if the demonstration took the effort to attempt to educate DC residents and lawmakers as to the simple fact that limiting the ammunition feeding devices of firearms will make no difference to criminals, well, we are addressing "firearms policy in the United States" as well. Of course, if you want to have some real fun, mix it up a little – try and feature every possible demographic, gender, ethnicity, and apparent income level combination in the crowd, just to see who gets arrested and who does not… or hand out Bluegun AR-15 magazines spray-painted black.
Something tells me a large number of those demonstrators would face a significantly more… interesting… experience than the kid-glove treatment a DC socialite enjoyed.
But, then, some animals are just more equal than others, are they not?