The Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms, Explosives, and Screwing Up a Good Time decided to go ahead and make itself clear regarding “stabilizing” “arm braces” on pistols. The takeaway you should take to heart is as follows:
The pistol stabilizing brace was neither “designed” nor approved to be used as a shoulder stock, and therefore use as a shoulder stock constitutes a “redesign” of the device because a possessor has changed the very function of the item. Any individual letters stating otherwise are contrary to the plain language of the NFA, misapply Federal law, and are hereby revoked.
Any person who intends to use a handgun stabilizing brace as a shoulder stock on a pistol (having a rifled barrel under 16 inches in length or a smooth bore firearm with a barrel under 18 inches in length) must first file an ATF Form 1 and pay the applicable tax because the resulting firearm will be subject to all provisions of the NFA.
Or, to put it another way, if there is a picture of you firing a pistol with your SB15 or equivalent item braced against your shoulder, and the BATFE gets their grubby little mitts on it, you could be facing up to and including 10 years in prison.
I particularly like how they specifically call out the previous letters and “revoke” them. I wonder if the people who wrote them still have their jobs? Given the state of “civil service”, I would wager yes.
Of course, the fact that anyone at the BATFE still has a job is a damning condemnation of “civil service” if there ever were one.
(Originally brought to my attention by WizardPC.)
A little while ago, I posted this quote on the Twitters:
Quemadmodum gladius neminem occidit: occidentis telum est.
To which Robb Allen responded:
That quote was from the National Sword Association, bought & paid for by the swordsmith lobby!
On the surface, that is an all-too-appropriate characterization of how anti-rights cultist treat any argument that boils down to “blame the person not the tool”, but think about the larger concept for a second.
You know that people – not the tools they happen to be using at the time – are responsible for their own actions. I know this. Any sane person knows this. But we still have people, even to this “modern” day, who blame the object, not the wielder.
And, as Seneca the Younger there demonstrates, this is not a new concept – after all, apparently it needed to be said, even back around 50 AD.
Think about that for a second; nearly 2000 years have elapsed since Seneca last picked up his pen, but we are still saddled, both legislatively and culturally, with the positively bizarre notion that objects are to blame for people’s actions, or objects cause people to act in certain ways, or so forth. For all that we consider ourselves modern, our society certainly has not matured very much past fetishists being terrified of little clay idols.
So I have had a Cannon gun safe (basically what turned into their Scout Series before it was actually named that) for a number of years now, and I have been planning on exploiting their ethernet/USB-pass-through features for almost as long, without any easy way of actually accomplishing that. The safe was always too far from the router for an ethernet cable to be anything but a trip hazard or eyesore, homeplug-style hardware works, strictly speaking, but I have never found it to be terribly reliable, and shoving a full computer in the safe did not exactly seem… well, safe, on account of heat build-up.
This past Christmas, Better Half provided me a solution by way of getting me a Raspberry Pi. For those who are unfamiliar with the concept, Pis are really, really small form-factor computers that can run basic Linux distributions (among other operating systems, but those are the big ones). They have no hard drive to speak of, and no real heat source, but they have USB connectivity, which is all I really needed for my little project to work.
I started by installing Raspbian by way of the NOOBS install package, which was about as painless an OS install as one can get. After turning on SSH (by way of the command “raspi-config”), I did not need to have a keyboard or mouse plugged into the Pi any more, and to keep things simple and always know “where” the Pi was, I had my router assign its MAC address a permanent IP address (I initially tried to have the Pi handle its own static IP, but that proved beyond my limited Linux abilities). Better Half also got me an Edimax EW-7811Un nano USB wireless dongle, and while there are instructions on how to get it set up and running from the command line, I will admit I was never able to get those to work… so I gave up and used the GUI interface inside “startx” which was about as painless as getting the adapter to work on Windows would have been.
After that just came the question of mounting an external, self-powered (or hub-powered – the Pi does not have massive USB power output abilities) hard drive and installing/configuring samba, and I now had a network-accessible hard drive that I could put basically anywhere in the house.
So I did.
Above, on the left, you can see the Pi resting on top of a Seagate 2TB external hard drive. Yes, it is that small. In the middle, you can see the inside of the safe’s power / USB / ethernet pass-through – the top two plugs are for the Pi and the hard drive, with the bottom plug being for the dehumidifier rod Better Half also got for me. Obviously the safe is a very large metal box, so wifi signal inside of it will not be optimal, if available at all (do safes count as Faraday cages?), so I had to use a male-to-male USB jumper to plug the Pi into the safe’s pass-through, and then a male-to-female USB extension to get the dongle on top of the safe, as seen in the right picture. Better Half also included this case with the Pi, which I still need to install.
The only other big thing I did was told my home router to refuse any and all incoming and outgoing traffic to/from the Pi (after updating it thoroughly, of course). The Pi and its hard drive are providing a tertiary backup to the RAID’d hard drive in my home computer, so there is no need for it to even know the internet exists.
Once that was all set up, I went into SyncBack and changed the destination of its nightly backup routines, and I was done.
Now, the Scout series is only good for 1200° for 30 minutes in fires, by which Cannon means the interior of the safe should not exceed 350° within that timespan given that exterior temperature. That is all good and well for paper and wood, but I have no idea how temperature-resistant external hard drives are. Still, that beats having the drive just sitting on a desk, and that is, of course, the bare minimum of most fire ratings these days – Cannon has pass-through-capable safes running all the way up to 90 minute fire ratings, and other companies claim fire resistances of even higher temperatures for as long or longer. Plus the safe offers a degree of physical protection for your data as well, in the event of a theft or other break-in.
I will not lie, you should at least be aware of command line interfaces before undertaking this project, and we definitely checked and rechecked everything before plugging a hard drive with backup data already on it into the Pi. But, all said, it really was not that bad, and gives some degree of security to those those 63,000 pictures I somehow managed to accumulate.
[Update] I had to implement this change in order to prevent the wifi connection from going to sleep. [/Update]
In case you have not heard, 12 people were murdered today by a couple of undereducated, over-indoctrinated, violent radicals who got their lace panties in a twist over a couple of cartoons depicting their chosen messiah in less-than-flattering ways.
And even without me specifying the religion of the attackers in that sentence, I bet you can figure out which one the murderous assholes adhered to without clicking through the link. Which is part of the problem.
Anywise, I had originally made this graphic to address anti-rights cultists who were demanding that I surrender my rights/property/etc., but it seems equally applicable to religious radicals who demand I surrender my rights/speech/etc.:
This variation is my current Twitter header:
(Original photo by Oleg Volk.)
Finally, there is a (graphic – you have been warned) video of the terrorists shooting a police officer begging for his life in the street. Assuming that video was taken with a cell phone, and assuming that cell phone’s field of view is anything like mine’s, a shot on those terrorists would not be difficult for a decently-practiced individual with a handgun, much less an actual carbine or rifle. At the very least, unexpected return fire from an elevated position would have distracted the terrorists and possibly saved the police officer’s – and others’ – life.
As I said on the Book of Faces and Twitters earlier today, just imagine if everyone with a camera or cell phone recording the shooting had a firearm – along with the training and will to use it – instead.
Or, as someone with a little more first-hand experience once stated:
Feel free to use these as you like, but remember that far better artists than me are risking their lives to express themselves. For some particularly disgusting individuals and groups, simply holding to or verbalizing a position different from theirs is sufficient cause for them to want to murder you; what is your planned response should they decide that you are next?
Me, I do not plan on going home in a body bag, and thus I will equip and train myself accordingly.
A separate discussion of my last post has cropped up on the Book of Faces, wherein NoeQuarter mentioned something I kept meaning to inject into my previous posts and completely forgot about:
Well the Atf have probably been losing money over people choosing the sig brace and not filing for the sbr tax form.
As of 2013, the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms, and Explosives was processing 200,000 NFA-related applications a year, which was a growth of over 380% from 2005. Each of those applications carries a check of $200 (assuming they are not for Any Other Weapons, which only cost $5 to transfer), which results in around $40,000,000 in revenue for the New York Avenue Boys. Obviously not all applications are for short-barreled rifles (I would bet the plurality, if not majority, are for suppressors), but if people are buying “pistol braces” instead of paying tax stamps, well, that is unrealized revenue for the BATFE, and we just cannot have that.
And after the BATFE came out and said, “Using such an accessory improperly would not change the classification of the firearm per Federal Law,” you know and I know and everyone knows why people were buying SB-15s – to brace their AR pistols on their forearms, of course.
Anywise, things have changed, and while the potential impact “pistol braces” had on the NFA tax stamp market may not have been the motivating factor in the BATFE’s changing opinions, it is always good to remind ourselves that the Bureau’s roots can be traced back to part of the Department of Treasury, originally as the “Revenue Laboratory”. The revenoors may have diversified from their original purpose, sure, but the government rarely gives up a source of revenue – any source of revenue – without a fight.
Just look at how many toll roads persist in keeping their tolls long after their construction has been paid for…
It seems the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms, and Explosives wants to make itself abundantly clear on the topic of “pistol braces”, this time in the form of a letter to Thordsen Customs, a company that makes “buffer tube covers” that allow for saddle kits to be attached to them.
As Mr. Adam Krout, Esq. says, the takeaway you want to pay attention to is this:
However, if a pistol assembled with an AR-type buffer tube or similar component; which in turn, redesigns the subject AR-type pistol to be designed or redesigned and consequently intended to be fired from the shoulder; an NFA weapon as defined in 26 U.S.C. § 5845(a)(3); has been made.
(Alright, seriously, does the BATFE just not proof anything that goes out their door any more? I could write a better sentence than that, and do so frequently.)
How will the BATFE, in its infinite wisdom, determine that you have changed a firearm such that it is now “intended to be fired from the shoulder”? I have not the foggiest, but I would reiterate that if there is any documentation of you using a pistol with a “pistol brace” attached to it by means of placing said “pistol brace” against your shoulder, I would go ahead and remove that from the intertubes now.
As for my SB15-equipped pistol? Well, like I have always said, it was built as a pistol and it is presently a pistol. I am contemplating replacing the SB15 with one of Thordsen’s kits, though, just to make that abundantly clear.
Also, given my prospective, and now cancelled, next build was going to be something that was not an AR-15 but used an AR-15 pistol buffer tube, I direct your attention to this paragraph:
The receiver extension/buffer tube on an AR-type pistol serves a legitimate, vital function in the operation of the weapon system; and if utilized as originally designed is not considered to be a shoulder stock. Further, a pistol that has an AR-type buffer tube or similar component assembled to it, which consequently allows for the installation of a saddle/cheek enhancement accessory, is not classified as an SBR; nor unlawful to possess.
On the one hand, a buffer tube serves absolutely no “legitimate, vital function” on a pistol built around a Charger receiver. On the other hand, the BATFE claims putting a buffer tube onto any given pistol does not make the pistol an SBR. On the gripping hand, now that the BATFE has mentioned it, I think I will just keep my distance.
I will not lie – I bought now-both of my SB15s to poke the bear, but I think it is safe to say that the bear is now fully aware of the situation and paying attention. What the bear does now is anyone’s guess, but I am betting it will not be pleasant for those to whom it does it. Like I said before, I sincerely hope the SB15 and its brethren are the foundation for knocking out at least the SBR portion of the NFA, but until that happens, the potential for Very Bad Things™ to happen to people over arbitrary and whimsical “determinations” remains pretty high.
(For bonus reading material, the Prince Law Offices blog has a couple of posts up about how “pistol braces” have… magically transformative properties. If honest-to-God lawyers are having difficulty figuring out what the BATFE is saying, I think I will back away slowly.)
So I was going to write a post about how my next firearm build was going to involve Ruger’s re-released Charger in a Nordic Components AR22 Stock Kit with an SB15 attached to the back end, but then the BATFE, in their infinite wisdom, went and said this:
Consequently, the attachment of the SB-15 brace to an AR-type pistol alone; would not change the classification of the pistol to an SBR. However, if this device, un-modified or modified; is assembled to a pistol and used as a shoulder stock, thus designing or redesigning or making or remaking of a weapon design to be fired from the shoulder; this assembly would constitute the making of a “rifle” as defined in 18 U.S.C. Section 921(a)(7).
Leaving aside their positively horrific grammar (seriously, learn what a semi-colon is and how to use it), apparently the act of taking an AR pistol with an SB15 brace attached and placing it against your shoulder “makes” the firearm in question a rifle. It is worth noting that this was written by Max M. Kingery, the Acting Chief of the Firearms Technology Industry Services Branch; on the other hand, these paragraphs were written by Earl Griffith, the Chief of the Firearms Technology Branch:
FTB classifies weapons based on their physical design characteristics. While usage/functionality of the weapon does influence the intended design, it is not the sole criterion for determining the classification of a weapon. Generally speaking, we do not classify weapons based on how an individual uses a weapon.
FTB has previously determined (see FTB # 99146) that the firing of a weapon from a particular position, such as placing the receiver extension of an AR-15 type pistol on the user’s shoulder, does not change the classification of the weapon. Further, certain firearm accessories such as the SIG Stability Brace have not been classified by the FTB as shoulder stocks and, therefore, using the brace improperly does not constitute a design change. Using such an accessory improperly would not change the classification of the weapon per Federal Law. However, FTB cannot recommend using a weapon (or weapon accessory) in a manner not intended by the manufacturer.
Now, the former blockquote – from FTB # 907010 – arguably supersedes the latter blockquote – from FTB # 903050 – just on account of being “newer”, however, here is the stickler: neither of these are legally binding, in any sense of the word. Both are simply “opinions” provided by the BATFE and only applicable to the specific case / question that they are responding to.
Which, as far as I can tell, means the BATFE is trying to set people up to be an example. The unfortunate truth is that we will not “really” know if the SB15 is legal to use as a stock until the BATFE does make an example of someone and the case goes before a court… But, suffice to say, if you have any pictures online of you using one from the shoulder, I might suggest taking them down at your earliest possible convenience.
(And for those people who incessantly whine, “Just get the tax stamp and make an SBR,” my answer remains, “No.” Having to pay $200 and pass a background check that verges on a proctology exam all for being allowed the “privilege” of shaving an inch off your rifle’s or shotgun’s barrel is completely and utterly asinine. I am all for finding any and all workarounds for that particular piece of archaic idiocy, and I sincerely hope the prevalence of the SB15 can and will be used to overturn the National Firearms Act, in part or full. I am not particularly optimistic about that happening, but I still support the attempt.)
(I do have to wonder what happens if you put a Glock in a stockless RONI and hold it up to your shoulder, though…)
And all that.
For those keeping score at home, the Remington 700 has been sold, to someone who was even aware of the whole story, no less.
While I was waiting for Remington to unscrew themselves, I concluded that a Savage Model 11 Long Range Hunter in 6.5 Creedmoor would be my next choice for a Boomershoot-able rifle, and went ahead and ordered one from Dragon Leatherworks.
Oh, did you not know? Dragon Leatherworks is presently a fully-operational FFL, from which you can order firearms and parts online. Obviously any firearm you purchase has to go through a local FFL, per the relevant federal laws, but here is the cut-above-the-rest detail for working with Dennis – he is planning on personally inspecting everything people buy from him before he sends it out. In the case of my rifle, he shipped it first to himself, checked it over, and then sent it on to my FFL; at least that way, I was sure I was getting a rust-free rifle.
The extra step added a few days, but given my last experience with mail-ordering firearms, it was worth it.
Atop the rifle I decided to mount a Vortex PST 6-24x SFP MOA optic by way of an EGW Heavy Duty 20MOA Scope Mount and EGW 0.990” Tactical Scope Rings.
If you have not heard of Vortex Optics, they are worth a look based on their warranty alone, and aside from that, their upper-end stuff gets consistently good reviews. Admittedly, I purchased the upper end of their middle line, but I have been pretty happy with it so far.
Evolution Gun Works Inc. is kind of an interesting company, if only because everything they make is serialized (well, that I have seen so far, at least). Sure, the scope mount is serialized, and that is not too surprising, but the scope rings are serialized as well – all four parts. Front and rear rings are made together, on the same machine, at the same time, so they are as close to “matching out the box” as you can possibly get.
Assembly of all the parts was about as easy as it is supposed to be. I ended up getting a Wheeler FAT Wrench to properly torque the mounts – I figured if I was going to spend that much on glass, I might as well do it right – and a couple of cheapy bubble levels to get the scope properly lined up with the bore. Amusingly, the leveling was the most annoying aspect of the installation – I would get everything more or less where I wanted them, torque down on the screws, and then see that everything shifted ever so slightly. I must have tightened and loosened the screws… honestly, I lost count.
The only other slight hiccup is that, while it does come in a Accustock, the Savage was not fully free-floated. The very tip of the stock touched the barrel, and apparently this is an issue that Savage has been aware of for a number of years now. I called up their customer support line, and they said I could send the stock back and they could fix it, or I could simply sand down the offending part of the stock and call it a day. 30 minutes of effort later with a piece of sand paper and a metal punch I had out in the garage, and I figure it is good enough for my uses.
With the rifle and optics sorted, the only thing remaining is ammunition – I went with Hornady’s Match 140gr A-Max rounds just based on their impressive (on paper, at least) performance, which, coincidentally, is exactly what Savage recommends for the rifle as well.
Alright, enough with the yammering; how did it actually shoot? Once I got the optic mostly sighted in (I ran out of ammo to get it really where I wanted it) and after I did shoot-five-swab for 50 rounds, these were the best three groupings in increasing awesomeness (all of them are 5 shots at 100 yards at an indoor range with a sandbag under the fore-end and my hand under the buttstock, and the squares are 1″):
0.88” grouping center-to-center if you include the flyers, which I did not call, so you probably should. 0.2” without the flyers.
1.1” grouping with the flyer, 0.47” without.
0.45” group, period.
If this rifle is starting as a 0.5 MOA rifle with my sorry arse-who-has-not-seriously-pulled-the-trigger-on-a-long-range-target-since-the-last-Boomershoot behind it, I think this is going to work out just fine.
I did have some interesting notes from the range… 24x allows me to self-spot my own hits without a spotting scope, which is something 16x did not. And after fooling around with glass at the last NRAAM, I realized I honestly cannot tell the difference between a $5000 scope and a $1000 scope in terms of clarity and color, but I definitely can tell the difference between a $850 scope and a $160 scope (I am trying to work up a post with photographs of the differences, but taking pictures through rifle scopes is annoyingly challenging). The adjustable comb on the Long Range Hunter model is nice, but I need to remember to try it on while wearing hearing protection before going to the range next time. I am never going to mix MOA and mil measurements on an optic again; the PST has an MOA reticle and MOA adjustments, which makes life so much easier. Apparently the muzzle brake on the LRH (which I left open – I will examine how closing it changes the point of aim later) makes the rifle quite loud, according to other people, though the noise was not that bad right behind it. Likewise, the recoil for the new round really was not that much worse than .243 Winchester – I know there was more energy being thrown downrange, but apparently the muzzle break counteracted it or the new rifle is heavier or something. And I have no idea if this is a normal characteristic for 6.5 Creedmoor, but the barrel never really warmed up (i.e. it was never uncomfortable to touch), and the brass was hardly even warm straight out of the chamber. Honestly, it was kind of strange, though I am not strictly complaining.
And, in reality, I think I am pretty happy with this outcome. Now I just need more trigger time.
On account of me potentially fumble-fingering the last version, and new yearly data being available, here is an updated version of the last one:
If anyone has any data from England and Wales that goes farther back than 1967, I would appreciate it – I have data on the US going back to 1960, but I want to compare equivalent time spans. The intersection point of those two trendlines is now about 40 years out, for those curious.
(United States murder rate from Disaster Center / FBI UCR. England/Wales murder rate from Office for National Statistics, Crime Statistics, Focus on Violent Crime and Sexual Offences, 2012/2013, Appendix Table 2.01. Readers are reminded that the murder rate in the United Kingdom as a whole is much higher than published, potentially up to two times higher, due to their … questionable … categorization methods.)
There is an advantage to having a vehicle with a built-in 120V adapter and a roof rack:
North Carolina being North Carolina, I figure it is only a matter of time before I am pulled over for having non-DOT-approved lights.
Yup, that is a real, live, honest-to-God, NCDOT traffic light underneath it.
No, I am not saying where we got it.
Yes, I wired it up myself.
Yes, there is a fire extinguisher handy.
I have a thing about raw meat. Blood does not bother me in the slightest, but I go out of my way to not touch raw meat – I use forks to hold things I am cutting, I am very careful about unwrapping the whole thing, and I am obsessive about washing my hands afterwards, regardless of whether or not I actually touched it. Honestly, this is probably one of the primary reasons I do not hunt*.
On a completely related note (I promise), Better Half and I elected to totally slack-out this past Thanksgiving, and got one of those all-in-one-meal-deals from Kroger, wherein they provide the turkey, the side dishes, and so forth, and we provide… well, the utensils. Frankly, it was awesome. I mean, the quality of the side dishes obviously did not measure up to what we could make for ourselves, but, by the same token, “preparation” consisted of shoving what could be in the oven for a few hours, and microwaving the rest, and “clean-up” consisted of putting a few plates in the dishwasher and throwing away the trays the food came in.
Yeah. I could get used to that.
Anywise, one of the primary reasons we went with a preprepared Thanksgiving meal is because we wanted to try a fried turkey, but had absolutely no interest in actually frying one ourselves. Kroger provided exactly that, so what the hey?
I want to stress that the turkey came from Kroger pre-cooked, and we followed the instructions for preheating – X amount of time in its foil, Y amount of time outside of the foil, and so forth. We accounted for its weight, and even left it in the oven a little long as we got everything else ready. In other words, we were not actually concerned over the meat being cooked.
Well, at the end of it, this is what the dark meat from the leg – arguably the most-definitely cooked portion of the bird – looked on my plate:
That red stuff at the back was the cranberry salad, but I did not get any on the piece of “dark” meat there at the center.
Yeah, given my difficulties with raw meat, finishing my dinner was… a challenge. After we wrapped up Thanksgiving proper, we shoved the turkey back into the oven, uncovered, and roasted it for another hour or three. After that, the meat reached more the consistency we were expecting, though the pinkish coloration stuck around.
So, yeah, fried turkey is tasty, but be prepared for an… unusual… coloration and consistency, unless you reheat the crap out of it. Though I have no idea if a freshly-fried turkey would have the same result.
(* – Another off those reasons being, as my father once phrased it, “It’s called ‘fishing’, not ‘catching’.” And a third reason is that I am not convinced that my accuracy is good enough. I think I am ok with killing prey**, but it would upset me to no end to mortally – or even not – wound an animal, only to be unable to finish the job because it got away.)
(** – Though, me being me, I would only kill something if I (1) planned on eating it or (b) was exterminating vermin (coyotes, prairie dogs, etc.).)
For being such an… interesting… drug, methotrexate pills are rather… unimpressive.
Anywise, I have managed to kick my rather persistent cold to the curb (that was a fun way to spend Thanksgiving), so we figured it was time to attack my immune system a new and different way. Because that sounds like fun.
Hopefully this stuff helps with the psoriatic arthritis. Or hopefully it does not suck too bad. With my recent history, though, I would not be surprised if I were 0 for 2.
I am certainly not encouraging my readers to knowingly break the law, nor am I saying I am going to break the law, but we all know how absurdly ineffective security theater really is, and the notion that law-abiding, peaceful citizens should be forcibly disarmed while criminals will simply ignore, bypass, or plow through the “security” measures is… distasteful.
Thankfully, people have been thinking outside the box when it comes to self-defense implements for inside “non-permissive” zones; for example, my tactical pen has been through airport security repeatedly on two continents with nary a problem. Or, if you want something a little more purpose-built, you can consider something like the SOB Puncher, created by the “Sheriff of Baghdad” John McPhee.
The Puncher measures 4.57” in overall length, and 2.165” in overall width, and is made of two laminated scales of G10 micarta and thus has no magnetic signature.
The handle section is 0.51” thick, with the blade segment being 0.255”, and the blade itself extends 2.6” past the finger guards.
This is definitely not meant to be an everyday-carry kind of knife; the G10 is dense enough that the grind does provide it a noticeable edge and a point that will assuredly work, but sharpening it is not really an option and the handle does not lend itself to trivial tasks like box-opening.
From a scant day of fooling around with it, I have found that gripping it, at least for me, has to be done carefully. If I just grab it quickly, the blade has a tendency to protrude out from my proximal interphalangeal joint (basically, the first one out from your knuckles), which cants it down about 30 degrees. It is still in the right direction, but one punches with one’s knuckles, not one’s fingers.
When I grasp the grip between my first and last phalanges, however (i.e. not involving my palm at all), the result would work just fine for an average punch.
Obviously strikes can be modified for the direction of the blade, but it is something to bear in mind.
I do not have any mil-spec-correct MOLLE equipment handy at the moment (the blade width – 1.03 at its widest – was designed to fit in those loops), but I dare say my tactical sporran provides a convenient place to mount it.
I am still contemplating how to make a kydex sheath/holster/holder for this thing, given I do not always have tactical gear on (no, really); I have a few random ideas, but am not sure whether or not I can execute them, especially since the goal is to use a minimum of metal, if any at all.
Alton Brown regularly warns against unitaskers, and I generally agree with him. In fact, SGM (ret) McPhee makes it quite clear that he intended this little implement for people who Go Places, Do Things, and intentionally put themselves in harm’s way… in other words, not lazy slobs like me. However, this tickled my irony bone, and serves as a wonderful reminder that if people really want to circumvent security measures, they can and they will. It is wise to plan, train, and possibly equip accordingly.
(Speaking of, I have no idea of the legality of carrying this gidget in your state, much less my own. I am not sure if this legally counts as a “knife” on account of having no metal or cutting edge to speak of, or what other category it might fall under. I imagine that if you were to use it, you would have larger issues to contend with, but, as always, your remaining lawful is up to you, not me.)
(If you want an SOB Puncher of your own, you will have to email SGM (ret) McPhee directly at “john (at) sobtactical (dot) com” on account of SOB’s marketplace not being operational quite yet.)
And as a palate-cleanser from the last post, I give you:
Have not had a chance to start the exciting meds yet… some stupid cold tackled me the day after we decided to proceed, and something told us that taking an immunosuppressive when already sick was something of a bad idea. Shocker, I know.
I realize I may be telling you something you already know, but I want to highlight this quote from the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms, and Explosives:
Based on Section 921(a)(3), air guns, because they use compressed air and not an explosive to expel a projectile, do not constitute firearms under Federal law — unless they are manufactured with the frames or receivers of an actual firearm. Accordingly, the domestic sale and possession of air guns is normally unregulated under the Federal firearms laws enforced by ATF.
In other words, and barring any kind of state legislation that might say otherwise, an air rifle can be mailed straight to your door, no background checks required, no questions asked, no paperwork (aside from the actual invoice, of course) necessary.
Of course, when I say “air rifle”, the vast majority of people probably think something along the lines of this:
Well, allow me to reproduce a portion of an article that came with a recent catalog from Pyramid Air:
In fact, a modern big bore air rifle that shoots a 500-grain .45-caliber bullet at half the muzzle velocity of a centerfire buffalo rifle will still shoot all the way through a 2000-lb. bison, sideways, exiting on the far side. Unless vital organs are hit, that animal will not drop anytime soon. But, hit the heart of a full-grown bison with a .45-caliber air rifle bullet, and it’s just as effective as the same bullet driven twice as fast from a .45/70. Both bullets pass entirely through the animal and do major damage if they hit vital organs or large bones.
Stephan Boles (right) dropped this bison with a Quackenbush .458 Long Action. His bullets passed entirely through this large animal. This hunt was guided by Eric Henderson. Photo provided by Eric Henderson.
The full story of the hunt is available here.
The Quackenbush .458 Long Action Outlaw Air Rifle can launch a 430 grain bullet at 732 feet-per-second at the barrel, translating to 509 foot-pounds of energy. For comparison, the once-ubiquitous Springfield Model 1873 could launch a 405gr bullet at 1394ft/s with an energy of 1748ft-lbf; for a more-direct analog, the energy output of the Outlaw is equivalent to some hotter loadings for .45 ACP.
And lest you think this is a new development, the Girandoni air rifle was employed by the Lewis and Clark expedition in 1804 for hunting deer with its 20-round magazine and 30-round air tank. Regardless, the Outlaw air rifle shoots exactly the same bullet as a .45-70 Trapdoor, and can achieve exactly the same end results.
And the Outlaw can be delivered straight to your door, no questions asked, no background checks executed.
So remind me how “universal” background checks are so necessary to ensure everyone’s safety? When anyone can go out and purchase an air rifle that can, quite literally, longitudinally perforate a buffalo, do we really care who can buy a .22 bolt-action rifle? To unironically quote our former Secretary of State, “What difference does it make?” When you can literally build a functioning firearm out of a shovel and spare parts, or when you can go out and mail-order a device that can put a buffalo in the dirt, or when barely-skilled laborers can craft frankly-terrifying firearms out of spare bits of scrap metal in their huts with scant more than hand tools, are you so stupid as to really think having to undergo a pointless and blatantly unconstitutional background check is going to serve as a functional impediment to someone looking to procure a means of killing someone at a distance?
The simple fact is “universal” background checks simply will not work, even looking past alternative methods for procuring ranged weapons. Firstly, criminals will continue to steal firearms, and a black market will continue to exist where those stolen / illegally procured firearms are sold and passed around. Secondly, without a universal registry of firearms, there is absolutely no way to prove whether or not a firearm was transferred before the “universal” background check law was passed, and, as such, people will keep selling firearms privately regardless of the law. Thirdly, both “universal” background checks and firearm registries will be met with massive civil disobedience, as they already are.
For heaven’s sake, states are not even bothering to prosecute background check failures as it is right now; how will adding more failures to the system make a difference?
If you do not know who owns what firearms (and you do not), if you cannot know who sold whom what firearm (and you cannot), and if you cannot stop people from selling each other firearms (and you still cannot), exactly what good are “universal” background checks?
Well that is an easy question to answer:
(Found at The View From North Idaho, originally crafted by OpenCarry.org.)
I admit that I have no bothered to wade through all 18 pages of I-594, but everything I have read from people better-versed in legalese than me who did leads me to believe that the above flow chart is more-or-less accurate.
As you can see, “universal” background checks like I-594 are plainly crafted to accomplish one thing, and one thing only – create more felons. Criminals will simply look at that nightmarish graphic and go, “F*ck it, I’ll get my gun from Tommy down the street,” and that is it. But if my wife were to go to the range with my parents and one were to hand the other a firearm… congratulations! They both just committed a misdemeanor. A couple of range trips like that, and, congratulations, they are both now felons.
All the while, criminals will steal their guns, or buy them on the black market, or, bizarrely enough, buy air rifles that are more than capable of killing a person if someone were to choose to do that. And while criminals are continuing to prey on increasingly defenseless victims, as more and more otherwise law-abiding citizens fall victim to byzantine idiocy like the image above, anti-rights cultists will pat themselves on the back and proclaim a job well done. After all, the “gun control” movement cannot remain relevant if firearm-related crime were to drop, and what better way to prevent that than make it functionally impossible to remain law-abiding?
I continue to oppose background checks, of any type, because they are morally and Constitutionally wrong, but the simple fact is the accomplish nothing at all (aside from making a few statists feel better about themselves for “doing something”), and anyone who tries to convince you they do is either lying or clueless themselves.
In any case, I-594 was the straw on my parents’ back – they are abandoning Washington state in the near-ish future, but given all the other idiotic laws that have been passed while they lived there (for example, the state laying claim to all rain water and banning rain barrels), I cannot blame them in the slightest. And, hell, I do not hunt and have absolutely no plans of ever starting, but I kind of want one of those Quackenbush Outlaws myself… it would be a nice complement to the Trapdoor Carbine I already have.
Alternative post title: “oh, right, that is why I do not reload yet”.
Now that I am seriously considering a 6.5 Creedmoor rifle to replace the .243 Winchester Remington 700 (which is still for sale, by the by), the desire to save a little money on what could be moderately expensive ammunition drove me to considering whether or not I should get into reloading. By now, anyone who is familiar with me will know what the outcome was:
Ideally that should be a fairly straightforward table. All of the prices are from Brownells or MidwayUSA, and the cost of the Commercial-Off-The-Shelf ammunition is for the loading that most closely mirrors what is in the reloading columns. I already have digital calipers, so they did not get factored in, and I mostly stuck with calibers that are easily reloaded by having the easiest-to-recover brass; the notable exception, of course, is 9mm, but I was just curious on that point. The cost-per-round for powder is a little off – I rounded anything less than $0.01 up to that – but otherwise the costs would just look strange. Individual calibers are calculating by adding the total of the “Fixed Costs” column with the relevant “Variable Costs” items (e.g. Large Primer equipment, 6.5 dies, and 6.5 shellplate for 6.5 Creedmoor), and then dividing that by the cost difference between COTS ammunition and reloads. Random details like tumbling media and replacement parts and so forth are not included, just for simplicity’s sake. I am sure I omitted a few pieces of equipment people would consider essential – the most notable are case prep being a rabbit hole I did not really want to go down, and cartridge boxes because I am not sure those count as consumables or not.
Once you reach the “Approximate Total Cost”, your equipment has been paid for, and you should basically only be paying for the materials necessary to reload – in other words, that is when you really see the “difference” go back into your pocket.
The other things that are not included are my time (which is, in fact, worth money), the value of being able to build up custom loads that I could not otherwise purchase off the shelf, and the lifespans of cases (mostly because then the question becomes whether you buy empties or all-up rounds and I was just not going to get into that).
So, apparently, the answer to “should I get into reloading?” is “I need to shoot a crapton more.”