“I guess our country had a good run, but welcome to the police state. When an apparently law-abiding citizen and veteran can be gunned down in his own home for owning legal property and being unfortunately related to a family of allegedly law-breaking pikers, this 'America' experiment of ours is well and truly over.”
by Linoge


Join 90 other subscribers




"walls of the city" logo conceptualized by Oleg Volk and executed by Linoge. Logo is © "walls of the city".

cz-52s and tt-33s, quick thoughts

If you have hung around firearm-related weblogs or communities very long, you have probably heard of the CZ-52 (more properly known as the Vz.52) and the TT-33 (or just TT, for Tula, Tokarev); both pistols are typically amongst the first firearms purchased by people who get their Curio and Relic license from the BATFE, which is hardly surprising, given their still-inexpensive-but-slowly-rising prices. Both pistols are functionally interchangeable, at least superficially – they carry the same number of the same cartridge, are both short-recoil operated, have locked breeches, are single-action only, and are arguably dangerous to carry with a round in the chamber – but they differ considerably on the specific details: the former is Czechoslovakian, the latter purely Soviet; the former employs a crazy roller-and-cam locking system borrowed from the German MG-42, the latter borrowed the swinging-link system from the venerable 1911; the former wraps its recoil spring around the barrel (which, unfortunately, is no help at all for its bore axis height), the latter employs the more-standard recoil spring guide rod system.

I had the opportunity to shoot both side-by-side this weekend (the CZ was mine, and unfired until I shot it; the TT was a friend’s), and I have to admit, while they are both markedly different, I would not go so far as to say one was better than the other. In fact, if the CZ-52 had a normal, functional magazine release and a decocking lever that was not prone to setting off chambered rounds, it would not be a bad little firearm at all… And if the TT had a safety that could be operated by, well, anyone (yes, I know the safety has to be added for importation purposes, but that does not make it any easier to use), it would be a decent, classic firearm as well.

And I do not think anyone can argue with the efficacy of 7.62x25mm out of a handgun… especially not now that Wolf is producing hollow-point loadings as well.

In fact, now that I just discovered the M57 variant of the TT-33 (one more round in the magazine and a 1911-style manual safety, without a huge increase in price), I may have just found my next C&R purchase… The only hitch on those is that the specific magazines are hard to come by / expensive. In any case, I had harbored masochistic dreams of running IDPA/IPSC with a CZ-52, but after trying to change out magazines in anything approximating a reasonable amount of time, I dare say the TT family would be a better choice…

For what it can do, it is a bit unfortunate the 7.62×25 round has been left by the wayside.

14 comments to cz-52s and tt-33s, quick thoughts

  • KN

    Damn you’re good…how did you know my first purchase with my newly printed C&R was a Tokarev TTC? Best pistol I ever bought for $200. Sadly, the milsurp ammo is drying up and raising the cost more than 9mm rounds.

    I did research the M57 but extra magazine prices are almost double the TTC.

    The 1950’s milsurp 7.62×25 ammo is extremely fast with no drop @ 100 yards. Bulgarian milsurp is decent ammo, while Polish milsurp has issues.

  • @ KN:
    I’m with you. My first two was a Mosin 91/30 (in one sitting), but my 2nd separate purchase was my Vz 52!

    He’s good!

  • Totally off topic, but happy Thanksgiving and thank you for everything you do to support the gun blogging community.

  • Sendarius

    Not to denigrate the 7.62mmx25mm cartridge, but IPSC has a bore diameter minimum of 9mm.

    I am sure that you could find a club that would let you shoot it (club level matches are explicitly allowed by the rules to violate some of the rules – go figure), but technically, you couldn’t shoot it for score.

    From a brief Google-search, IDPA has the same restriction.

  • rickn8or

    As far as Vz-52s are concerned, there are 9mm conversion barrels available. If you get the cam and rollers and assemble it, a caliber change only takes as long as a field strip. Trouble is, they’re hard to find and cost almost as much as a decent Vz-52.

    AIM had Yugo M57’s, 2 mags and holster for a pretty decent price, but they seem to have disappeared into cruffler’s safes. I only managed to snag one and was contemplating another when I discovered this.

    And what Brigid said about Happy Thanksgiving to you and all your readership.

  • Mark@Sea

    Slick that thing up with some nice wood grips and a decent holster! It will go well with the hat.

  • Sorry for leaving a puddle of drool on your blog, but I was just imagining a carbine chambered for this round. This round could make a Hi-Point carbine look sexy…. 😉

  • Mark@Sea

    Dang, Wideners is closed over the weekend. Probably a good thing.

  • Nathan

    It really is a shame that rounds been lost to history. Think of the kind of capacity you could get in a double-stack configuration. And all speedy, low-weight, flat-shooting rounds too. Plus, it’s bottle-necked, so it would inherently feed and extract more reliably than straight-walled rounds. And think of the carbine conversions! Those are rather popular at the moment.

  • @ KN: Call it enlightened intuition” ;).

    If you look around, you can find new-production 7.62×25 for about equivalent to 9mm in prices, but, yeah, it is a shame the milsurp stuff is drying up. At least you will not have to worry about immediately cleaning your gun, though ;).

    @ Weer’d Beard: First four guns were two Mosins (separate transactions) and two unfired CZ-52s. Sometimes projection is right ;).

    @ Brigid: Thanks, and I hope you and Barkley had an outstanding Thanksgiving as well!

    @ Sendarius: This gives me a sad. Of course, if you let 7.62×25 compete, you would almost have to let .32ACP compete, and Lord knows where that would go.

    *shrug* It is not like I would be setting any records with either gun ;). Will just have to check at the clubs to ensure they let people shoot for fun, rather than scores.

    @ rickn8or: AIM still has M57 mags, but no signs of the firearms. And there are 9mm conversion barrels for the TT-33 family as well, but they have the same cost problem.

    @ Mark@Sea: I may have spent my “nice wood grips” money for the time being, but if you are buying… ;).

    Speaking of, have any spare TT mags? 😉

    @ AuricTech: There used to be a new-production Sterling clone that shot 7.62×25, available in both pistol and carbine formats, but it seems to have disappeared. But, yeah, that round in a rifle barrel would be awesome.

    @ Nathan: See, it is things like this that make me wish I knew a bloody thing about firearm production… or knew someone who did :).

  • Mark@Sea

    I think I might have an extra or two floating around here someplace… Will be happy to make you another holster, as long as you don’t want a paddle :). Kidding, but that was a pain to build. Sure seems to be conforming nicely, but how comfortable is it?

  • Actually, this time around I am thinking about a “low-rider” concept, but we can discuss that offline :).

    Honestly, the holster wears just fine – you can take it for a spin next time we are up your way. I do believe you hit on something of a revolutionary idea by sneaking that metal clip into the fold of the leather, and I would happily endorse any attempt you make at making more money off that idea :). And, really, if it can support a brick like a Baby Eagle…

  • One of my “If I had the stuff to try it” projects would be a M1 Carbine in 7.62×25; that’d be interesting.

    I tried loading some Hornady 90-grain HP bullets in this; it penetrated four water jugs completely, found the core in the 5th jug and the jacket in the 4th. I’ve been told the Wolf hollowpoints hold together a bit better; either way, it’d give a goblin a severe case of heartburn.

  • With my new low-ride holster keeping the gun out of the way of the backpack straps, I have to wonder at the efficacy of a 7.62×25 handgun for a hiking firearm. The recoil is manageable, the penetration is basically inarguable, and you can carry as many 7.62 as you can 9mm.

    I do wonder about things like bears… bigger does seem to be better with them.