The question has been asked a thousand times before, and will probably be asked thousands more times after this, but why are "gun control" supporters so very violent?
On the one hand, Edward McClelland wants to violently destroy millions, of not billions, of dollars of personal property for crimes that property’s owners never committed nor are responsible for. Ever wondered why I call "gun control" supporters anti-rights cultists? Edward is a perfect example.
On the other hand, Andrew Goddard makes a rather stupid joke at the expense of a person who made a negligent discharge into his own leg. So much for Andrew’s supposed sympathy for gunshot victims… though it does dovetail perfectly with his historic exploitation of the same.
And, on the gripping hand, competitive shooters completely failed to perforate one another over a remarkably heated disagreement.
Oh. Wait. That last one does not really go with the first two, does it?
I wonder what the difference is…