The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.
“Unlawful” is unlawful, and “unlawful” under the color of the law is especially bad.
The good news is that I do not live in Indiana or Kentucky so I am not bound by any rulings in those states, and while I might have hoped that this blatantly unconstitutional “legislating from the bench” in Indiana might be overruled by higher scrutiny, apparently the Kentucky case dashed those hopes all over the Constitution. Regardless, if I did live in those states, and someone was attempting to unlawfully gain access to my house while wearing a get-up that might resemble a police officer’s uniform… well, my response would remain the same as it always has been.
(More here, here, here, here, here, here, here, here, here, here, here, here, here, here, here, here, here and here. Suffice to say, we “average” citizens are less than impressed with the output of our legal system’s “higher” minds.)