You know how anthropogenic global warming cultists prattle on and on about how their con-men’s papers are “peer reviewed” and thus above reproach, question, or doubt? Well, here are 450+ peer-reviewed papers supporting skepticism of anthropogenic global warming, spread out amongst 140+ journals, with publishing dates ranging from 2009 all the way back to 1994 and possibly beyond (I did not check all 450+).
So, if “peer review” is an indication that the paper in question is unquestionably, absolutely, and totally the truth, and a documentation of the facts, well, then, it would seem as though the AGW twits would seem to have a problem.
It intrigues me how much AGW cultists and anti-rights advocates have in common… But, then, both groups’ positions are based substantially on faith, beliefs, and a quest for undeserved power and totalitarian control over other people, so I guess it figures.
[...] the flawed research, bringing to light serious cases of scientific and ethical malpractice, and indicating the reams of dissenting data and studies from hundreds of sources sound like exactly the kinds of tactics the Brady Bunch [...]