Just got a document dump

From the Restaurant Carry Lawsuit. I’m reading a response by the Attorney General’s Office to a “Statement of Undisputed Facts” by owners of the Melrose restaurant in Nashville, TN
The lawyer who wrote this response was certainly having fun with it. For example:

It is not disputed that Statement 6 represents the Intervenors’ opinions and concerns. However, Statement 6 does not represent the factual situation for all Tennessee restaurant owners who hold licenses to sell alcoholic beverages

There’s lots of these little “Awww…that’s cute! You think you’re a real lawyer!” type staments in here.
I’ll put up the docs later, with some IANAL analysis.