<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: an open challenge</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.wallsofthecity.net/2009/09/an_open_challenge.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.wallsofthecity.net/2009/09/an_open_challenge.html</link>
	<description>defending our rights from the ramparts</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 19:20:42 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: walls of the city</title>
		<link>http://www.wallsofthecity.net/2009/09/an_open_challenge.html#comment-3160</link>
		<dc:creator>walls of the city</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Nov 2009 19:22:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wallsofthecity.net/?p=1921#comment-3160</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;commenters are required to submit fingerprints&lt;/strong&gt;

Today&#039;s bigotry-exposing word-replacement exercise subject is UBU52, a regular commenter troll at Robb&#039;s and Joe&#039;s places. Have you ever had a person loudly, obnoxiously, and rudely try to correct you on something, only to find out, in very short order...
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>commenters are required to submit fingerprints</strong></p>
<p>Today&#8217;s bigotry-exposing word-replacement exercise subject is UBU52, a regular commenter troll at Robb&#8217;s and Joe&#8217;s places. Have you ever had a person loudly, obnoxiously, and rudely try to correct you on something, only to find out, in very short order&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: walls of the city</title>
		<link>http://www.wallsofthecity.net/2009/09/an_open_challenge.html#comment-3159</link>
		<dc:creator>walls of the city</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Oct 2009 17:32:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wallsofthecity.net/?p=1921#comment-3159</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;&quot;despicable&quot; does not do her justice&lt;/strong&gt;

Recently, I have been highlighting some of the bigotry so prevalent on the anti-rights side of the spectrum (thanks to inspiration from pro-rights acitivist extraordinaire, Joe Huffman) by going through some choice quotes from anti-rights advocates and...
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>&#8220;despicable&#8221; does not do her justice</strong></p>
<p>Recently, I have been highlighting some of the bigotry so prevalent on the anti-rights side of the spectrum (thanks to inspiration from pro-rights acitivist extraordinaire, Joe Huffman) by going through some choice quotes from anti-rights advocates and&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: walls of the city</title>
		<link>http://www.wallsofthecity.net/2009/09/an_open_challenge.html#comment-3158</link>
		<dc:creator>walls of the city</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Oct 2009 22:51:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wallsofthecity.net/?p=1921#comment-3158</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;scum of the earth&lt;/strong&gt;

Unsurprisingly to anyone who is familiar with him, Bryan Miller said some heinously atrocious things about Meleanie Hain&#039;s death, using the opportunity of an innocent woman&#039;s untimely and violent death to gloat and preen. I will not repost Bryan&#039;s exac...
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>scum of the earth</strong></p>
<p>Unsurprisingly to anyone who is familiar with him, Bryan Miller said some heinously atrocious things about Meleanie Hain&#8217;s death, using the opportunity of an innocent woman&#8217;s untimely and violent death to gloat and preen. I will not repost Bryan&#8217;s exac&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: walls of the city</title>
		<link>http://www.wallsofthecity.net/2009/09/an_open_challenge.html#comment-3157</link>
		<dc:creator>walls of the city</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Oct 2009 17:29:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wallsofthecity.net/?p=1921#comment-3157</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;comes out all the same&lt;/strong&gt;

For today&#039;s installment of blatant and outright bigotry, I give you yet another modified quote from our most-frequent repeat offender - none other than MikeB302000 himself. Again, as with the previous incarnations of this exercise, I will stress that t...
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>comes out all the same</strong></p>
<p>For today&#8217;s installment of blatant and outright bigotry, I give you yet another modified quote from our most-frequent repeat offender &#8211; none other than MikeB302000 himself. Again, as with the previous incarnations of this exercise, I will stress that t&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: walls of the city</title>
		<link>http://www.wallsofthecity.net/2009/09/an_open_challenge.html#comment-3156</link>
		<dc:creator>walls of the city</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Oct 2009 22:13:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wallsofthecity.net/?p=1921#comment-3156</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;calling them out&lt;/strong&gt;

Weer&#039;d is having a party, but you are not invited. Instead, he wants to hear from all of the anti-rights, gun-banning, hoplophobic ninnies who think dressed-up firearms are somehow more dangerous than their wood-stocked counterparts, who think that &quot;se...
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>calling them out</strong></p>
<p>Weer&#8217;d is having a party, but you are not invited. Instead, he wants to hear from all of the anti-rights, gun-banning, hoplophobic ninnies who think dressed-up firearms are somehow more dangerous than their wood-stocked counterparts, who think that &#8220;se&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: walls of the city</title>
		<link>http://www.wallsofthecity.net/2009/09/an_open_challenge.html#comment-3155</link>
		<dc:creator>walls of the city</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Sep 2009 16:56:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wallsofthecity.net/?p=1921#comment-3155</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;showing him for what he is&lt;/strong&gt;

To continue a meme that is gathering steam throughout the gunblogosphere, I give you a quote from a raving anti-rights advocate known as &quot;mikeb302000&quot; (who shall remain linkless for obvious reasons)... only this quote is a little edited (though the...
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>showing him for what he is</strong></p>
<p>To continue a meme that is gathering steam throughout the gunblogosphere, I give you a quote from a raving anti-rights advocate known as &#8220;mikeb302000&#8243; (who shall remain linkless for obvious reasons)&#8230; only this quote is a little edited (though the&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Linoge</title>
		<link>http://www.wallsofthecity.net/2009/09/an_open_challenge.html#comment-3154</link>
		<dc:creator>Linoge</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Sep 2009 11:03:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wallsofthecity.net/?p=1921#comment-3154</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Weer&#039;d:&lt;/strong&gt;  You pretty much summed it up perfectly with this comment:
&lt;blockquote&gt;Those who don&#039;t respect the 2nd Amendment don&#039;t respect the entire bill of rights!&lt;/blockquote&gt;
... which is why I do not really forsee an actual response to my inquiry.  The simple reality is that all of the rights protected by the Constitution are also equal in the eyes of the Constitution - if you oppose one, you oppose them all, which leaves you in a relatively awkward position.
By the same token, I am somewhat surprised that any anti-rights advocates reading this weblog were able to think that far ahead and avoid the trap, but maybe my readership is lower than I give myself credit for ;).
&lt;strong&gt;AnotherGunGuy:&lt;/strong&gt;  To be fair, one person I directly challenged &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=1924344627977203862&amp;postID=8898424865532061100&amp;pli=1&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;did have a response&lt;/a&gt;:
&lt;blockquote&gt;Linoge, You should know by now that I would never ever allow you to dictate terms to me like that, like you&#039;re the teacher and I&#039;m the student.&lt;/blockquote&gt;
Granted, he did not even try to explain, rationalize, defend, or support his own position, which speaks volumes to either his own character, or the indefensibility of his position (or both), but at least it &lt;em&gt;was&lt;/em&gt; something approximating a response.
Of course, this is from the same individual &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.haloscan.com/comments/khbaker/2752611867551464407/#607044&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;who admitted he has no way of determining fact from fiction&lt;/a&gt;, so I guess I should not be surprised that the rest of his mental processes are equally deficient.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Weer&#8217;d:</strong>  You pretty much summed it up perfectly with this comment:</p>
<blockquote><p>Those who don&#8217;t respect the 2nd Amendment don&#8217;t respect the entire bill of rights!</p></blockquote>
<p>&#8230; which is why I do not really forsee an actual response to my inquiry.  The simple reality is that all of the rights protected by the Constitution are also equal in the eyes of the Constitution &#8211; if you oppose one, you oppose them all, which leaves you in a relatively awkward position.<br />
By the same token, I am somewhat surprised that any anti-rights advocates reading this weblog were able to think that far ahead and avoid the trap, but maybe my readership is lower than I give myself credit for <img src='http://www.wallsofthecity.net/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> .<br />
<strong>AnotherGunGuy:</strong>  To be fair, one person I directly challenged <a href="https://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=1924344627977203862&#038;postID=8898424865532061100&#038;pli=1">did have a response</a>:</p>
<blockquote><p>Linoge, You should know by now that I would never ever allow you to dictate terms to me like that, like you&#8217;re the teacher and I&#8217;m the student.</p></blockquote>
<p>Granted, he did not even try to explain, rationalize, defend, or support his own position, which speaks volumes to either his own character, or the indefensibility of his position (or both), but at least it <em>was</em> something approximating a response.<br />
Of course, this is from the same individual <a href="http://www.haloscan.com/comments/khbaker/2752611867551464407/#607044">who admitted he has no way of determining fact from fiction</a>, so I guess I should not be surprised that the rest of his mental processes are equally deficient.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: anothergunguy</title>
		<link>http://www.wallsofthecity.net/2009/09/an_open_challenge.html#comment-3153</link>
		<dc:creator>anothergunguy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Sep 2009 11:33:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wallsofthecity.net/?p=1921#comment-3153</guid>
		<description>That chirping noise is from the crickets on the anti side.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That chirping noise is from the crickets on the anti side.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Weer'd Beard</title>
		<link>http://www.wallsofthecity.net/2009/09/an_open_challenge.html#comment-3152</link>
		<dc:creator>Weer'd Beard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Sep 2009 05:51:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wallsofthecity.net/?p=1921#comment-3152</guid>
		<description>Well it&#039;s simple.  The Anti-Freedom types see ALL rights as subject to restriction and believe they are GRANTED by our government, and of course have no problem with having to issue a &quot;good reason&quot; to exercise it.
Of course this all needs to be done without infringing on the rights THEY use in their day-to-day.
ie: it&#039;s totally OK to pat down all people within a mile of a Democrat politician to check for guns, and it should be OK to inspect the houses of gun owners to make sure they aren&#039;t selling them on the black market....but you can&#039;t pat down somebody to discover the dime bag of pot they carry because of the 4th Amendment...
Those who don&#039;t respect the 2nd Amendment don&#039;t respect the entire bill of rights!
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well it&#8217;s simple.  The Anti-Freedom types see ALL rights as subject to restriction and believe they are GRANTED by our government, and of course have no problem with having to issue a &#8220;good reason&#8221; to exercise it.<br />
Of course this all needs to be done without infringing on the rights THEY use in their day-to-day.<br />
ie: it&#8217;s totally OK to pat down all people within a mile of a Democrat politician to check for guns, and it should be OK to inspect the houses of gun owners to make sure they aren&#8217;t selling them on the black market&#8230;.but you can&#8217;t pat down somebody to discover the dime bag of pot they carry because of the 4th Amendment&#8230;<br />
Those who don&#8217;t respect the 2nd Amendment don&#8217;t respect the entire bill of rights!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

