Hm. I think we need a Sluggy-style recap:
Dan Cooper supports Senator Barack Hussein Obama – arguably, a man who would prove to be the most anti-gun President in history.
Gunbloggers express their displeasure with this decision, and let him know that they will no longer support him or his decisions by way of his company.
His company asks him to stand down.
Media gets involved (prompting no fewer than 2500 comments – pretty gorramed impressive, that).
Hoplophobes and Obama-supporters act like complete and utter asses.
An olive branch is extended (and I agree entirely with the sentiment, as expressed in my first quoted paragraph here).
Blame is misdirected by a false-flag, deceptive organization known as AHSA.
And some people just do not get it, while others disagree, but are remarkably rational and polite about it.
That about sum things up?
And all of this happened because a group of people exercised their Constitutionally-protected right to disagree with someone else, and their inherent rights as consumers to not support an organization with which they disagree.
Crazy, huh?
dissent is not tolerated
Over this weekend, I happened to leave a comment on a post entitled “Talk About Shitty People” regarding the Dan Cooper situation. Judging from the website’s name (“Blue Herald”), I probably should have known better, but no one has ever…
if you say so
I had initially left this as a comment over at Sebastian’s place (concerning the Dan Cooper situation), but he emailed me this morning and requested I make a full-fledged weblog post out of it. So mote it be (with a…