<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: just a useless piece of paper</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.wallsofthecity.net/2008/10/just_a_useless_piece_of_paper.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.wallsofthecity.net/2008/10/just_a_useless_piece_of_paper.html</link>
	<description>defending our rights from the ramparts</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 19:20:42 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rosemary's Thoughts</title>
		<link>http://www.wallsofthecity.net/2008/10/just_a_useless_piece_of_paper.html#comment-1088</link>
		<dc:creator>Rosemary's Thoughts</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Oct 2008 23:42:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wallsofthecity.net/?p=728#comment-1088</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;They Tried, But They Couldn&#039;t Hide It, They Tried...&lt;/strong&gt;

Just who is they and what did they try to hide? Very good questions. &#039;They&#039; is the Democrats, especially the Obama team, and the &#039;what&#039; is the video that proves this financial fiasco can be laid at their front doorstep. [Here&#039;s the video]
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>They Tried, But They Couldn&#8217;t Hide It, They Tried&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>Just who is they and what did they try to hide? Very good questions. &#8216;They&#8217; is the Democrats, especially the Obama team, and the &#8216;what&#8217; is the video that proves this financial fiasco can be laid at their front doorstep. [Here's the video]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: walls of the city</title>
		<link>http://www.wallsofthecity.net/2008/10/just_a_useless_piece_of_paper.html#comment-1087</link>
		<dc:creator>walls of the city</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Oct 2008 14:59:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wallsofthecity.net/?p=728#comment-1087</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;required reading&lt;/strong&gt;

This link is required reading for anyone interested in maintaining their Second Amendment rights, much less their Constitutional rights in general. As a presidential candidate, Barack Obama must demonstrate executive experience, but he remains strangel...
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>required reading</strong></p>
<p>This link is required reading for anyone interested in maintaining their Second Amendment rights, much less their Constitutional rights in general. As a presidential candidate, Barack Obama must demonstrate executive experience, but he remains strangel&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Linoge</title>
		<link>http://www.wallsofthecity.net/2008/10/just_a_useless_piece_of_paper.html#comment-1085</link>
		<dc:creator>Linoge</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Oct 2008 19:55:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wallsofthecity.net/?p=728#comment-1085</guid>
		<description>It is astonishing to me that a politician and lawyer like Biden would make such an obviously erroneous statement concerning the Constitution, and go on at such length about it.  I mean, these people make a job of working with the Constitution, and yet they have absolutely no idea what it says?  Comforting, that.
&quot;Ignorant&quot; is putting it &lt;em&gt;very&lt;/em&gt; mildly.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It is astonishing to me that a politician and lawyer like Biden would make such an obviously erroneous statement concerning the Constitution, and go on at such length about it.  I mean, these people make a job of working with the Constitution, and yet they have absolutely no idea what it says?  Comforting, that.<br />
&#8220;Ignorant&#8221; is putting it <em>very</em> mildly.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: walls of the city</title>
		<link>http://www.wallsofthecity.net/2008/10/just_a_useless_piece_of_paper.html#comment-1086</link>
		<dc:creator>walls of the city</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Oct 2008 12:37:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wallsofthecity.net/?p=728#comment-1086</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;pants on fire&lt;/strong&gt;

Senator Joe Biden lies. 1. TAX VOTE: Biden said McCain voted &#8220;the exact same way&#8221; as Obama to increase taxes on Americans earning just $42,000, but McCain DID NOT VOTE THAT WAY. 2. AHMEDINIJAD MEETING: Joe Biden lied when he...
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>pants on fire</strong></p>
<p>Senator Joe Biden lies. 1. TAX VOTE: Biden said McCain voted &ldquo;the exact same way&rdquo; as Obama to increase taxes on Americans earning just $42,000, but McCain DID NOT VOTE THAT WAY. 2. AHMEDINIJAD MEETING: Joe Biden lied when he&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David</title>
		<link>http://www.wallsofthecity.net/2008/10/just_a_useless_piece_of_paper.html#comment-1084</link>
		<dc:creator>David</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Oct 2008 16:16:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wallsofthecity.net/?p=728#comment-1084</guid>
		<description>*heh* I turned to my Wonder Woman and noted (heck, I crowed) &quot;GAFFE! More evidence Biden cheated his way through law school!&quot; when he uttered that fatuous remark about the constitutional role of the VP. (Not thaT I&#039;m a lawyer or a constitutional scholar or anything, but I have read the thing and did audit a class taught by someone who actually had... and who went on to serve with more honor than Biden or Obama in the U.S. Senate.)
*sheesh!*
And you noticed The Obamassiah&#039;s criterion for constitutional amendments in the Saddleback interview, didn&#039;t you? Ann Coulter&#039;s recent analysis is better than what I said when I read the transcript. By B. Hussein Obama-Winfrey&#039;s criterion, the 13th Amendment has no place in our Constitution. *heh*
A couple of dangerously ignorant and arrogant asses are Barry and Blowhard Joe.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>*heh* I turned to my Wonder Woman and noted (heck, I crowed) &#8220;GAFFE! More evidence Biden cheated his way through law school!&#8221; when he uttered that fatuous remark about the constitutional role of the VP. (Not thaT I&#8217;m a lawyer or a constitutional scholar or anything, but I have read the thing and did audit a class taught by someone who actually had&#8230; and who went on to serve with more honor than Biden or Obama in the U.S. Senate.)<br />
*sheesh!*<br />
And you noticed The Obamassiah&#8217;s criterion for constitutional amendments in the Saddleback interview, didn&#8217;t you? Ann Coulter&#8217;s recent analysis is better than what I said when I read the transcript. By B. Hussein Obama-Winfrey&#8217;s criterion, the 13th Amendment has no place in our Constitution. *heh*<br />
A couple of dangerously ignorant and arrogant asses are Barry and Blowhard Joe.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Linoge</title>
		<link>http://www.wallsofthecity.net/2008/10/just_a_useless_piece_of_paper.html#comment-1083</link>
		<dc:creator>Linoge</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Oct 2008 11:05:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wallsofthecity.net/?p=728#comment-1083</guid>
		<description>It is kind of sad that in Obama&#039;s case, all of that expensive and time-consuming education has gone to such a complete waste.
But you are right - in most politicians&#039; cases, when they abridge or ignore the Constitution, they might be able to claim ignorance (though, as with most things, that is no excuse).  However, in Obama&#039;s case, there is no doubt - his attacks on Constitutional rights stem from complete and utter maliciousness.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It is kind of sad that in Obama&#8217;s case, all of that expensive and time-consuming education has gone to such a complete waste.<br />
But you are right &#8211; in most politicians&#8217; cases, when they abridge or ignore the Constitution, they might be able to claim ignorance (though, as with most things, that is no excuse).  However, in Obama&#8217;s case, there is no doubt &#8211; his attacks on Constitutional rights stem from complete and utter maliciousness.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: LearnAboutGuns.com</title>
		<link>http://www.wallsofthecity.net/2008/10/just_a_useless_piece_of_paper.html#comment-1082</link>
		<dc:creator>LearnAboutGuns.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Oct 2008 23:44:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wallsofthecity.net/?p=728#comment-1082</guid>
		<description>You really hit the nail on the head when you referred to Obama as &quot;a Constitutional law teacher who has used that knowledge and education to find all of the loopholes and workarounds he possibly can, whether they exist or not.&quot;  It is the very fact that Obama was a constitutional law professor yet chooses to undermine the 2nd Amendment that I find so troubling.  Other uninformed legislators who violate the 2nd Amendment can at least claim ignorance, but not Obama.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You really hit the nail on the head when you referred to Obama as &#8220;a Constitutional law teacher who has used that knowledge and education to find all of the loopholes and workarounds he possibly can, whether they exist or not.&#8221;  It is the very fact that Obama was a constitutional law professor yet chooses to undermine the 2nd Amendment that I find so troubling.  Other uninformed legislators who violate the 2nd Amendment can at least claim ignorance, but not Obama.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

